Talk:DB/Holidays: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
And I also want to ask where he got the information about "region" and "looping" from, those fields are basically nowhere to be found (still investigating this). | And I also want to ask where he got the information about "region" and "looping" from, those fields are basically nowhere to be found (still investigating this). | ||
-- click @ 2013.02.15 05:00 | |||
--[[User:Click|Click]] 04:06, 15 February 2013 (UTC)-- click @ 2013.02.15 05:00 | |||
Revision as of 06:06, 15 February 2013
Either Schlumpf must have used a modified DBC or SQL-data when investigating the fields, or the DBC actually varies between different locale-versions of the files (which I seriosuly doubt). The full mapping from the DBC is 55 fields, this is on a en_US client, and the locale-references are located on field 49 and 51 (which references the id). I've corrected this to reflect the en_US (12340) client.Also, removing the information for field2, which is the original AND correct method to detect timeskew is not a good thing - that actually explains the whole DBC and how it works on the specific "timescheduler" informed of in field 53.
And I also want to ask where he got the information about "region" and "looping" from, those fields are basically nowhere to be found (still investigating this).
--Click 04:06, 15 February 2013 (UTC)-- click @ 2013.02.15 05:00