Regarding the COL type

The COL type has an int32 value of 4411212, which translates to "\0COL" following the reading convention. Since a leading \0 makes little sense, maybe this should be read as "LOC" (as in Location) instead of "COL"? This is of course pure speculation at the moment, since I haven't looked at the contents of this field so far. Thaumiel 18:47, 1 March 2010 (UTC)